Provincial Trusts in a Bankruptcy
In The Guarantee Company of North America v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2019 ONCA 9 the Court of Appeal held that the statutory trust created by s.8 of the Construction Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30 (the CA) is a trust that falls within s. 67(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B.3 (the BIA), and, therefore the subject matter of the trust was not property of the bankrupt divisible amongst their creditors.
In December 2014, A-1 Asphalt Maintenance Ltd. (A-1) was deemed bankrupt while having four major paving projects on the go, three with the City of Hamilton (the City) and one with the Town of Halton Hills (the Town). The City and the Town owed A-1 money for the work that A-1 had performed and A-1 had not fully paid some of its subcontractors prior to their bankruptcy.
As directed by the bankruptcy judge, a paving projects account was established for monies paid by the City and the Town to be deposited in. Once the monies were deposited into the paving projects account a question was raised concerning who had priority to the monies in the said account: the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) as a secured creditor of A-1 pursuant to a General Security Agreement; the Guarantee Company of North America (GCNA) as a bond company and secured creditor of A-1 that had paid out 20 lien claims to certain suppliers and subcontractors; or, certain employees that worked on the four projects as represented by their unions. The priority dispute engaged both s.8(1) of the CA and s.67(1)(a) of the BIA.
The Construction Act
Section 8(1) of the CA states:
“(1) All amounts,
(a) owing to a contractor or subcontractor, whether or not due or
(b) received by a contractor or subcontractor,
on account of the contract or subcontract price of an improvement constitute a trust fund for the benefit of the subcontractors and other persons who have supplied services or materials to the improvement who are owed amounts by the contractor or subcontractor. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30, s. 8 (1); 2017, c. 24, s. 66.”
The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act
Section 67(1)(a) of the BIA states:
“67 (1) The property of a bankrupt divisible among his creditors shall not comprise
(a) property held by the bankrupt in trust for any other person;”
Court of Appeal of Ontario Decision
The Court of Appeal essentially held that a provincially created trust will fall within s.67(1)(a) of the BIA provided that it satisfies the general principles of trust law. According to the general principles of trust law, a trust is created where there is certainty of intention to create a trust, certainty of subject matter and certainty of object. The Court of Appeal concluded that s.8(1) of the CA satisfied the general principles of trust law. It was clear from s.8(1) of the CA that there was an intention to create a trust and what the object of the trust was. The only question that arose is whether there was certainty of subject matter.
With respect to certainty of subject matter, the Court of Appeal held that the amounts owed by the City and the Town on account of the paving projects were debts and that a debt is a chose in action which can be the subject matter of a trust. The statutory trust created by s.8(1) of the CA attached to the debts. The fact that the funds deposited into the paving projects account were co-mingled did not mean that there was no certainty of subject matter as long as the funds were readily ascertainable and identifiable. In this case the funds were identifiable due to the records that were kept.
In the end, the Court of Appeal held that GCNA and the unions had priority to the funds in the paving projects account.
Since the construction industry is built upon layers of contracts and subcontracts that involve different levels of employees and tradespeople, this decision is important as it ensures that these workers can get paid for their work before the secured creditor if proceeds are available in the trust.
If you have further questions regarding bankruptcy, insolvency or debts owed, contact the insolvency and collections lawyers at Merovitz Potechin LLP. For questions regarding the Construction Act, contact Roxie Graystone.
The content on this website is for information purposes only and is not legal advice, which cannot be given without knowing the facts of a specific situation. You should never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. The use of the website does not establish a solicitor and client relationship. If you would like to discuss your specific legal needs with us, please contact our office at 613-563-7544 and one of our lawyers will be happy to assist you.