• Categories
  • Categories

    Does a Seller Have to Wait for a Better Market to Sell their Property in Order to Mitigate Their Damages Where

    In Briscoe-Montgomery v. Kelly, 2014 CarswellOnt 9707 (S.C.J.), the plaintiffs sold their hobby farm to the defendant for the sum of $458,000.  The closing was scheduled for September 14, 2012.  The defendant failed to close because of lack of financing.  The plaintiffs then immediately relisted the home for sale at a price of $449,000.  They were unable to sell their property in September, October and November.  On the advice of their real estate agent, the plaintiffs reduced their selling price to $429,000.  They ultimately accepted an offer at $415,000 in January 2013 and the sale closed on March 1, 2013.

    The defendant alleged that the plaintiffs could have obtained a higher selling price by waiting to relist their property the following spring since it is generally better to sell in the spring.  As a result, the defendant argued that the plaintiffs failed to mitigate their damages.

    The court held that the plaintiffs did not fail to mitigate their damages by not waiting until the spring to relist their property just because it is generally better to sell in the spring. It was reasonable for the plaintiffs to promptly return their property to the market and to accept the first reasonable offer that they received.

    The content on this website is for information purposes only and is not legal advice, which cannot be given without knowing the facts of a specific situation. You should never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. The use of the website does not establish a solicitor and client relationship. If you would like to discuss your specific legal needs with us, please contact our office at 613-563-7544 and one of our lawyers will be happy to assist you.

    Noah Potechin

    Posted By: Noah Potechin (Of Counsel) of Merovitz Potechin LLP

    Of Counsel