• Categories
  • Merovitz Potechin Blog


    Enforcement of Non-Competition Clauses in Employment Agreements

    Are you entering into an employment agreement with an employee who could seriously affect your business if they left your employment and started competing against you?  If so, then you might want to consider including a non-competition agreement in the employment agreement.  However, you should be aware that courts in general do not like non-competition agreements because they are seen to be in “restraint of trade.”

    Consequently, in order for a court to uphold a non-competition agreement, the employer will have to show that the “restraint of trade” was reasonable.

    Generally speaking, most non-competition agreements prevent an employee from competing with the employer in a specific geographical area for a specific period of time.  However, the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Rhebergen v. Creston Veterinary Clinic Ltd., ([2014] B.C.J. No. 417) recently considered a non-competition agreement that did not prevent the employee from competing with the employer following the termination of their employment, but rather imposed specific amounts that the employee would have to pay the employer if it did compete with the employer in a specific geographic area over a specified period of time.  Even though the clause did not specifically prevent the employee from competing with the employer, the Court found, on a functionalist approach, that the clause was in restraint of trade.  The Court then went on to consider whether the restraint was reasonable and found that it was essentially because the employer arrived at the figures that the employee would have to pay in a reasonable manner.

    The employer had based their calculations on their experience with a previous employee who had left their practice.  The employer calculated the investment that would be made in the new employee with respect to mentoring, training and equipment which amount they would not recover unless the employee remained with them for 3 years.  They ultimately calculated their unrecoverable costs and what they considered to be the impact on their goodwill if the employee competed with them.  Based upon those calculations they arrived at figures that the employee would have to pay if they departed after the first year, the second or the third year of a three year term contract.

    The content on this website is for information purposes only and is not legal advice, which cannot be given without knowing the facts of a specific situation. You should never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. The use of the website does not establish a solicitor and client relationship. If you would like to discuss your specific legal needs with us, please contact our office at 613-563-7544 and one of our lawyers will be happy to assist you.

    Posted By: Merovitz Potechin

    Merovitz Potechin LLP has been serving the business and personal needs of the Ottawa area since 1976. Our lawyers will work directly with you throughout your legal matter.

    We are committed to asking the right questions so you obtain the best advice. We are responsive to your needs, and you can trust that we will give you the care and attention you deserve.